GEO is new. There aren't decades of case studies. No industry certifications. No established benchmarks. Every agency with an SEO background is suddenly a "GEO expert."
From my experience on both sides of this table, the difference between agencies that deliver and agencies that don't comes down to how they think. Do they understand what LLMs actually want? Can they execute the technical foundations? Do they have the authority-building capabilities that make optimization actually work?
Here are the 10 questions that separate real practitioners from repackaged SEO shops.
TL;DR
- •GEO without strong SEO foundations is a house built on sand
- •Technical implementation (schema, structured data) is non-negotiable
- •Authority building (PR, coverage) matters more than optimization tactics
- •Watch for agencies that can't work with your developers and designers
- •How they think matters more than case studies in this emerging space
The 10 Questions
GEO doesn't replace SEO. It extends it. An agency without deep SEO expertise is trying to build a second floor without a foundation. The same signals that make content rank on Google—authority, relevance, technical excellence—are what AI models use to decide what to cite.
This is the question that exposes pretenders. Schema and structured data are how you tell AI systems what your content means. If an agency can't speak fluently about Organization schema, FAQ schema, HowTo markup, and entity relationships, they're not doing real GEO work.
GEO requires implementation. Schema needs to be deployed. Site architecture needs to change. Content structures need design support. An agency that only delivers strategy documents and "recommendations" will leave you with a PDF and no results.
Here's what most GEO agencies miss: AI models cite sources they trust. You can optimize content structure perfectly, but if AI doesn't recognize your brand as authoritative, you won't get cited. Authority comes from PR, industry coverage, expert mentions, and consistent presence across trusted sources.
AI platforms change constantly. If an agency can't tell you specifically what changed and how they responded, they're not actually monitoring and adapting. This question tests whether they're practitioners or just reading the same blog posts you are.
ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot all work differently. Perplexity searches in real-time. ChatGPT uses periodic training. Gemini powers Google's AI Overviews. An agency should know these differences and have platform-specific strategies.
This tests their mental model. Do they understand how LLMs process and evaluate content? The right answer involves entities, relationships, trust signals, and extractable structures. The wrong answer sounds like SEO keyword optimization with AI buzzwords.
Traditional SEO metrics (rankings, traffic) don't fully capture GEO performance. You need citation tracking, brand mention monitoring across AI platforms, and query coverage analysis. An agency should have tools and processes for this.
Real practitioners have tested this. They know that data tables work differently than paragraphs. That FAQ structures get extracted more reliably. That certain content patterns consistently outperform others for AI citation.
This reveals their process. A real GEO agency has a systematic approach: audit, baseline measurement, quick wins, foundation building. Vague answers about "strategy development" and "stakeholder alignment" mean they're making it up as they go.
- "We don't handle technical implementation" - GEO without technical execution is just strategy documents
- "Schema is someone else's job" - Structured data is core to how AI understands content
- "We focus only on content optimization" - Without authority building, optimization doesn't matter
- Can't name specific AI platform differences - They're guessing, not testing
- No measurement tools for AI citation tracking - They can't prove results
- "GEO is completely different from SEO" - They don't understand the foundation
In an emerging space, how they think matters more than case studies. Any agency can show you a traffic graph and claim GEO credit. The questions above test whether they actually understand the mechanics.
The four capabilities you need: Strong SEO foundation, technical implementation (especially schema), authority building (PR and coverage), and cross-platform expertise. If any of these are missing or outsourced, keep looking.
Trust your gut on the technical questions. If they fumble on schema, can't explain LLM retrieval logic, or treat implementation as "your team's problem," they're not ready to deliver real GEO results.
Frequently Asked Questions

Yuval Halevi
Helping SaaS companies and developer tools get cited in AI answers since before it was called "GEO." 10+ years in B2B SEO, 50+ cybersecurity and SaaS tools clients.