Growtika
    Cybersecurity AI Visibility

    AI Search for Cybersecurity Companies: The Complete Visibility Playbook

    When prospects ask ChatGPT for SIEM recommendations, your competitor appears. You don't. Here's the technical fix.

    By Yuval Halevi|January 2026|25 min read

    From my experience working with 50+ cybersecurity vendors: the companies with the best products are often the most invisible to AI. This follows the same patterns we see in our LLM visibility research.

    Your threat research is excellent. Your detection rates are industry-leading. You have SOC 2, HIPAA, FedRAMP. And when someone asks ChatGPT "What's the best XDR for mid-market companies?" you're nowhere in the response.

    Your competitor with a worse product shows up first. This isn't random. It's a structural problem with how security vendors communicate with AI systems. Understanding how SEO is changing after LLMs is essential context here.

    TL;DR

    • Entity consistency is foundation. AI can't recommend you if it's confused about who you are.
    • Disambiguation engineering. Tell AI what you are NOT to prevent miscategorization.
    • LLM Sitemap + llms.txt. Technical files that tell AI exactly what you do.
    • Second-order citations. Get covered by publications AI already cites (Dark Reading, CSO Online).
    • Threat reports as citation bait. Numbered findings get quoted verbatim.
    • Changelog as freshness signal. Active updates prove you're not legacy tech.
    • Perplexity in weeks, ChatGPT in months. Different platforms, different timelines.

    Jump to Section

    Why AI Ignores Your Security Company

    Let's start with what actually happens when a prospect asks ChatGPT for security tool recommendations.

    AI systems don't evaluate products. They evaluate entities. And entity recognition comes from:

    • Consistency. Is your company name identical everywhere? Website, LinkedIn, G2, Crunchbase, press mentions?
    • Corroboration. Do multiple independent sources confirm what you claim?
    • Context. Can AI connect your brand to specific use cases and categories?

    Most security vendors fail on all three. Their LinkedIn says "Acme Security" but their website says "Acme, Inc." Their G2 profile lists different features than their homepage. The only place that calls them "HIPAA compliant" is their own trust page. We explore this pattern in depth in our AI SEO tools guide.

    The Hard Truth

    Your competitor isn't winning AI citations because they have a better product. They're winning because AI trusts what it knows about them more than what it knows about you.

    Test Your Current Position

    Run these five queries in ChatGPT and Perplexity. Document exactly what appears.

    AI Visibility Audit

    Copy each prompt, run in ChatGPT and Perplexity, document results

    What are the best [your category] tools for mid-market companies?
    What compliance certifications does [Your Company] have?
    Compare [Your Company] vs [Top Competitor] for [specific use case]
    What [your category] is best for companies with [your ICP constraint]?
    Who founded [Your Company] and what does the company do?

    Score: 0-1 mentions = Critical | 2-3 = Moderate | 4-5 = Strong

    Entity Architecture: Building AI Recognition

    Entity consistency is the foundation everything else builds on. If AI is confused about who you are, nothing else works.

    The Disambiguation Problem

    Security vendors create category confusion constantly. "We're an XDR, but we also do SIEM, and we have EDR capabilities, and our platform includes SOAR workflows..."

    AI doesn't know what to do with this. When someone asks "best XDR for mid-market," AI looks for entities that are clearly XDR vendors. If your messaging is muddy, you lose.

    AI Gets Confused

    "We provide a unified security platform that combines XDR, SIEM, and SOAR capabilities with cloud-native architecture and AI-powered analytics for comprehensive threat detection and response."

    AI Gets It

    "Acme is an Extended Detection and Response (XDR) platform. We are NOT a SIEM (we integrate with SIEMs). We are NOT a managed service (we are a product)."

    Key Insight

    Disambiguation is as important as definition. Telling AI what you're NOT prevents miscategorization. This is especially critical in security, where category overlap is constant.

    The Technical Stack: llms.txt, LLM Sitemap, Schema

    Three technical implementations work together to make your entity clear to AI:

    llms.txt Template for Security Vendors

    Create this file at yourcompany.com/llms.txt. For more on how AI crawlers find and use these files, see our 51-point AI visibility checklist:

    llms.txt
    # [Your Company] - Security Platform Overview
    
    > AI-powered [category] for [target market]
    
    [Your Company] provides [one-sentence description]. 
    We serve [specific customer segments] across [industries].
    
    ## What We Are
    - Managed Detection and Response (MDR) platform
    - Cloud-native, SaaS delivery model
    - 24/7 SOC with human analysts
    
    ## What We Are NOT (Important Distinctions)
    - NOT a self-hosted SIEM (we are fully managed)
    - NOT agent-based (we are agentless)  
    - NOT just software (we include human analysis)
    
    ## Compliance Certifications
    - SOC 2 Type II: Certified since [year], audited by [auditor]
      Recertified: December 2025
    - HIPAA: BAA available, covers [specific capabilities]
    - FedRAMP: [Status - Authorized/In Process]
    
    ## Core Capabilities
    - [Capability 1]: [One sentence with metric]
    - [Capability 2]: [One sentence with metric]
    
    ## Documentation
    - Trust Center: /security
    - API Docs: /docs/api
    - Changelog: /changelog
    - MITRE Mapping: /mitre-coverage

    The Changelog as Freshness Signal

    In cybersecurity, "old" implies "insecure" or "abandoned." AI models have a recency bias for technology queries. If your last major content update was 2023, AI lowers its confidence score, assuming you might be legacy tech. This ties into the broader content strategies that actually work for AI citations.

    Freshness Signal Tactic

    Maintain a public changelog or "What's New" feed at /changelog and include it in your sitemap.xml and llms.txt.

    Regular, dated updates signal to AI that the entity is "alive" and "active." When a user asks "What are modern/current solutions for X?", active changelogs serve as a timestamped heartbeat that pushes you ahead of competitors who haven't published since last year.

    LLM Sitemap Structure

    Unlike XML sitemaps (which just list URLs), an LLM Sitemap is an HTML page that gives AI context about your content structure. It combines human navigation with semantic information AI can extract.

    What Makes LLM Sitemap Different

    XML sitemaps tell crawlers "these pages exist." LLM Sitemaps tell AI "here's what these pages are about, how they relate to each other, and what questions they answer."

    For a cybersecurity vendor, this means organizing content by: Solutions (by role, by use case), Compliance (by regulation), Integrations (by platform), and Resources.

    Key sections for your LLM Sitemap:

    SectionWhat to IncludeWhy AI Needs It
    Solutions by RoleCISO, SOC Analyst, Security Engineer pagesMatches "best [tool] for [role]" queries
    Compliance HubSOC 2, HIPAA, FedRAMP, GDPR sectionsMatches "[regulation] compliant [tool]" queries
    Integration DirectoryAWS, Azure, Splunk, ServiceNow pagesMatches "[tool] that integrates with [platform]"
    Use CasesThreat detection, compliance automation, etc.Matches problem-focused queries
    Section FAQs3-5 questions per section with answersPre-answers queries directly on sitemap

    Schema Implementation

    Add this to your homepage and key pages:

    JSON-LD Schema
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "Organization",
      "name": "Your Company",
      "description": "[Exact same description as llms.txt]",
      "hasCredential": [
        {
          "@type": "EducationalOccupationalCredential",
          "credentialCategory": "certification",
          "name": "SOC 2 Type II",
          "recognizedBy": {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "AICPA"
          }
        }
      ]
    }

    Content Architecture: What AI Actually Cites

    AI doesn't cite "comprehensive guides." It cites specific, quotable content that answers specific queries. Your content architecture needs to create citation opportunities.

    The Threat Report Citation Hack

    Most security vendors write threat reports. Few optimize them for AI citation. Here's what works: AI systems heavily cite specific data from original research. When your threat report says "we observed a 340% increase in credential stuffing attacks targeting healthcare organizations in Q3," that becomes quotable.

    Threat Report Citation Tactic

    Create a dedicated "Key Findings" page for every threat report with numbered findings:

    Finding 1: We observed a 340% increase in credential stuffing attacks targeting healthcare organizations in Q3 2025.

    Finding 2: 67% of successful breaches exploited unpatched vulnerabilities older than 90 days.

    AI extracts these as authoritative data points. Your competitors write 40-page PDFs that AI can't parse. You write 500-word summary pages that AI quotes verbatim.

    Alt-Text Engineering for Architecture Diagrams

    Cybersecurity buyers trust architecture diagrams. Modern AI (GPT-4o, Gemini) is multimodal. It "looks" at your images. If your "How it Works" diagram is a flat PNG with alt text "architecture diagram," you are invisible.

    AI Sees Nothing

    <img src="arch.png" alt="architecture diagram">

    RAG systems scrape text but ignore pixels. Your security architecture is completely invisible.

    AI Understands Everything

    Use SVGs with embedded text, or write 300-word "Caption-based Interpretations" immediately below:

    "Figure 1: Data flows from Collector (A) through Encryption Tunnel (B) to Cloud Analysis Engine (C). Customer data never leaves the premises..."

    The Vendor Security Questionnaire as Content

    Every security vendor completes hundreds of security questionnaires (VSQs) per year. Most treat this as a cost center. Smart vendors turn questionnaire answers into AI-ready content.

    Tactic

    Create a public FAQ page from your top 50 VSQ questions. Use FAQPage schema. Now when ChatGPT is asked "Does [Company] support SSO?", it has a structured answer to cite.

    Advanced Tactics for Security Vendors

    1. The "Competitor Comparison" Page Play

    When someone asks ChatGPT "Compare [Your Company] vs [Competitor]," what does it find?

    Most vendors don't own their comparison narrative. Create structured comparison pages with:

    • Feature-by-feature comparison tables
    • Use case fit ("Best for" statements)
    • Compliance coverage comparison
    • Integration compatibility matrix

    The vendor who creates the comparison page controls the narrative AI uses.

    2. The "Adjective Seeding" Strategy

    AI recommendations often use adjectives: "fastest," "most comprehensive," "best for small teams." Where do these adjectives come from?

    They come from external sources. Reviews, articles, forums.

    Tactic

    When requesting G2 reviews, frame the ask: "We'd love to hear about your experience, especially around speed of deployment and quality of support."

    Reviews that mention "fastest deployment I've seen" seed the adjective "fast" into AI's understanding of your brand.

    3. MITRE ATT&CK Mapping as Structured Data

    Security buyers increasingly ask AI questions tied to MITRE ATT&CK framework. "What tools detect T1059?" "Which XDR covers persistence techniques?"

    If your MITRE coverage is a PDF, AI can't cite it. Create HTML pages with structured tables:

    Technique IDTechnique NameDetection Method
    T1059Command-Line InterfaceProcess monitoring with behavioral analysis
    T1566PhishingML-based email analysis with attachment sandboxing
    T1078Valid AccountsUEBA detecting anomalous login patterns

    When someone asks ChatGPT "What tools detect T1059 command-line interface attacks?" your table becomes a citable source.

    4. The "Docs-to-Marketing" Injection

    Technical buyers (and AI agents acting for them) often search documentation to verify claims before visiting the marketing site. Most docs are dry and devoid of value propositions.

    Add "Micro-Positioning" to your top 10 most visited documentation pages:

    Standard Docs

    "To configure SSO, go to Settings..."

    Docs + Positioning

    "The SSO configuration allows large enterprises to enforce zero-trust access policies seamlessly. To configure..."

    5. The "What AI Gets Wrong" Content Play

    Search ChatGPT and Perplexity for queries in your category. Find answers that are wrong or outdated.

    Create content that explicitly corrects common misconceptions:

    Example: "Is SIEM Dead? Why the 'SIEM is obsolete' narrative misses the point"

    When AI encounters a query like "Is SIEM still relevant in 2026?", your corrective content becomes a valuable counter-source.

    6. Certification Date Freshness Signal

    Certifications have dates. Old dates equal stale signals.

    Tactic

    Update certification content annually, even if nothing changed. Add "Recertified [Year]" or "Most recent audit: [Date]" to your compliance pages.

    The vendor who shows "SOC 2 Type II - Recertified December 2025" looks more current than the one showing "SOC 2 Type II certified" with no date.

    Authority Building: Second-Order Citations

    You optimize for AI to cite you directly. Good. But here's the expert move: optimize for AI to cite pages that cite you.

    Example: Dark Reading publishes an article about SIEM trends. They mention your company as an example. ChatGPT cites Dark Reading. Your brand appears in the response even though AI didn't visit your site.

    Publications AI Cites Most for Cybersecurity

    *Based on citation frequency analysis across 500+ security queries*

    PublicationAI Citation RateBest Pitch Angles
    Dark ReadingVery HighThreat research, incident analysis, tool comparisons
    SecurityWeekHighVulnerability disclosures, market analysis
    CSO OnlineHighCISO perspectives, compliance topics
    SC MagazineModerateProduct reviews, awards coverage
    Krebs on SecurityHighBreach analysis, threat actor profiles

    The Strategy

    Pitching Dark Reading isn't just PR anymore. It's AI visibility infrastructure. Track which publications AI cites most frequently for your category queries, then pursue coverage specifically on those publications.

    Integration Partner Entity Boost

    AI systems cross-reference entities. When AI sees your company listed on Okta's integrations page, AWS Partner Directory, and Splunk Marketplace, it builds confidence that you're a legitimate player in the ecosystem.

    Audit every integration partner's website:

    • Are you listed correctly?
    • Is your company name consistent?
    • Is your description accurate?

    Priority integrations to audit for cybersecurity vendors:

    CategoryPlatforms to Audit
    SIEM/SOARSplunk, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM QRadar, Chronicle
    IdentityOkta, Azure AD, OneLogin, Ping Identity
    Cloud MarketplacesAWS, Azure, GCP
    ITSMServiceNow, Jira, PagerDuty

    Each correct listing is an entity signal. Each inconsistency fragments your entity.

    Authority Building Priority

    *Ranked by AI citation frequency in security category*

    Source TypeWhat to DoTimeline
    G2 / Capterra / TrustRadiusAdd certifications to profile. Request reviews mentioning compliance.1-2 weeks
    Industry PublicationsPitch Dark Reading, CSO Online, Security Week with compliance angles.2-4 weeks
    Press ReleasesIssue PR for every certification, major feature, funding round.1 week
    Analyst ReportsEnsure Gartner/Forrester profiles are current with certifications.Ongoing
    Reddit / CommunitiesAnswer compliance questions in r/cybersecurity, r/sysadmin.Ongoing

    The 70/30 Rule

    Aim for 70% of your key claims to appear on 3+ independent sources. The remaining 30% can be unique details on your site. Core certifications, integrations, and differentiators need external validation.

    90-Day Execution Plan

    Here's the week-by-week roadmap. Each phase builds on the previous.

    *Timeline expectations based on 50+ cybersecurity vendor implementations*

    PlatformFirst ResultsWhy
    Perplexity2-4 weeksReal-time web search, SEO-driven
    Google AI Overviews4-8 weeksTied to search index
    Claude60-120 daysPeriodic training updates
    ChatGPT60-180 daysLarger model, slower updates

    01Days 1-14: Foundation

    Run the 5-query AI audit
    Document baseline in ChatGPT and Perplexity. Screenshot results. Note competitor positions.
    Impact: highTime: 2 hours
    Audit entity consistency across all platforms
    Check Website, LinkedIn, G2, Capterra, Crunchbase, integration partner pages. Fix mismatches.
    Impact: highTime: 4-6 hours
    Create llms.txt with disambiguations
    Place at domain root. Include certifications, key pages, AND 'What We Are NOT' section.
    Impact: highEffort: low
    Verify technical access for AI crawlers
    Check robots.txt allows GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot. Verify Cloudflare isn't blocking.
    Impact: highTime: 1 hour
    Set up public changelog
    Create /changelog page. Add to sitemap and llms.txt. Commit to weekly updates.
    Impact: mediumTime: 2 hours

    02Days 15-45: Content Build

    Build LLM Sitemap with MITRE mapping
    Create HTML sitemap with section descriptions, FAQs, cross-links, and MITRE ATT&CK coverage table.
    Impact: highEffort: medium
    Create 'Key Findings' pages for threat reports
    Extract numbered findings from existing PDFs. Create HTML pages with quotable metrics.
    Impact: highEffort: low
    Add architecture diagram captions
    Write 300-word interpretations below every architecture diagram. Describe data flows in text.
    Impact: mediumTime: 3-4 hours
    Create situation-based content pages
    'XDR for 50-person fintech with SOC 2' style pages. Match ChatGPT query patterns, not Google.
    Impact: highEffort: medium
    Convert security questionnaire answers to public FAQ
    Turn your CAIQ/SIG answers into structured FAQ pages. Add FAQPage schema.
    Impact: highEffort: low
    Add micro-positioning to documentation
    Inject value propositions into top 10 most-visited docs pages. 'This feature enables zero-trust...'
    Impact: mediumTime: 2-3 hours

    03Days 46-90: Authority & Scale

    Update review platforms with adjective seeding
    G2, Capterra, TrustRadius. Request reviews using questions that generate 'fastest,' 'lowest false positive' language.
    Impact: highEffort: medium
    Pitch high-citation publications
    Dark Reading, SecurityWeek, CSO Online. Pitch threat research angles, not product announcements.
    Impact: highEffort: medium
    Audit all integration partner listings
    Splunk, Okta, AWS, Azure, ServiceNow. Verify name consistency and accurate descriptions.
    Impact: highTime: 4-6 hours
    Create 'What AI Gets Wrong' corrective content
    Find incorrect AI answers in your category. Create content that corrects misconceptions.
    Impact: mediumEffort: low
    Update certification dates for freshness
    Add 'Recertified December 2025' to all compliance pages. Update Schema dateModified.
    Impact: mediumEffort: low
    Re-run AI audit and measure progress
    Compare to Day 1 baseline. Document improvements. Identify remaining gaps.
    Impact: highTime: 2 hours

    The Bottom Line

    • Your security product might be excellent. AI doesn't know that. AI systems recommend entities they recognize and trust. Recognition comes from consistency. Trust comes from corroboration.
    • Second-order citations compound. Getting covered by Dark Reading isn't just PR. It's AI visibility infrastructure. Publications AI already trusts become your amplification layer.
    • Specificity beats comprehensiveness. "XDR for 50-person fintech with SOC 2" outperforms "Complete Guide to XDR" every time. Match how CISOs actually ask ChatGPT questions.
    • The technical stack matters. llms.txt + disambiguations + LLM Sitemap + Changelog tell AI exactly what you do, what you're NOT, and that you're actively maintained.
    • The window is closing. Companies building AI presence now shape what AI says about their category for years. The ones who wait will find themselves invisible in the conversations that matter.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Yuval Halevi

    Yuval Halevi

    Helping SaaS companies and developer tools get cited in AI answers since before it was called "GEO." 10+ years in B2B SEO, 50+ cybersecurity and SaaS tools clients.