From my experience working with 50+ cybersecurity vendors: the companies with the best products are often the most invisible to AI. This follows the same patterns we see in our LLM visibility research.
Your threat research is excellent. Your detection rates are industry-leading. You have SOC 2, HIPAA, FedRAMP. And when someone asks ChatGPT "What's the best XDR for mid-market companies?" you're nowhere in the response.
Your competitor with a worse product shows up first. This isn't random. It's a structural problem with how security vendors communicate with AI systems. Understanding how SEO is changing after LLMs is essential context here.
TL;DR
- Entity consistency is foundation. AI can't recommend you if it's confused about who you are.
- Disambiguation engineering. Tell AI what you are NOT to prevent miscategorization.
- LLM Sitemap + llms.txt. Technical files that tell AI exactly what you do.
- Second-order citations. Get covered by publications AI already cites (Dark Reading, CSO Online).
- Threat reports as citation bait. Numbered findings get quoted verbatim.
- Changelog as freshness signal. Active updates prove you're not legacy tech.
- Perplexity in weeks, ChatGPT in months. Different platforms, different timelines.
Jump to Section
Why AI Ignores Your Security Company
Let's start with what actually happens when a prospect asks ChatGPT for security tool recommendations.
AI weights entities by recognition strength and external validation. Better product doesn't mean better visibility.
AI systems don't evaluate products. They evaluate entities. And entity recognition comes from:
- Consistency. Is your company name identical everywhere? Website, LinkedIn, G2, Crunchbase, press mentions?
- Corroboration. Do multiple independent sources confirm what you claim?
- Context. Can AI connect your brand to specific use cases and categories?
Most security vendors fail on all three. Their LinkedIn says "Acme Security" but their website says "Acme, Inc." Their G2 profile lists different features than their homepage. The only place that calls them "HIPAA compliant" is their own trust page. We explore this pattern in depth in our AI SEO tools guide.
The Hard Truth
Your competitor isn't winning AI citations because they have a better product. They're winning because AI trusts what it knows about them more than what it knows about you.
Test Your Current Position
Run these five queries in ChatGPT and Perplexity. Document exactly what appears.
AI Visibility Audit
Copy each prompt, run in ChatGPT and Perplexity, document results
Score: 0-1 mentions = Critical | 2-3 = Moderate | 4-5 = Strong
Entity Architecture: Building AI Recognition
Entity consistency is the foundation everything else builds on. If AI is confused about who you are, nothing else works.
The Disambiguation Problem
Security vendors create category confusion constantly. "We're an XDR, but we also do SIEM, and we have EDR capabilities, and our platform includes SOAR workflows..."
AI doesn't know what to do with this. When someone asks "best XDR for mid-market," AI looks for entities that are clearly XDR vendors. If your messaging is muddy, you lose.
"We provide a unified security platform that combines XDR, SIEM, and SOAR capabilities with cloud-native architecture and AI-powered analytics for comprehensive threat detection and response."
"Acme is an Extended Detection and Response (XDR) platform. We are NOT a SIEM (we integrate with SIEMs). We are NOT a managed service (we are a product)."
Key Insight
Disambiguation is as important as definition. Telling AI what you're NOT prevents miscategorization. This is especially critical in security, where category overlap is constant.
The Technical Stack: llms.txt, LLM Sitemap, Schema
Three technical implementations work together to make your entity clear to AI:
llms.txt Template for Security Vendors
Create this file at yourcompany.com/llms.txt. For more on how AI crawlers find and use these files, see our 51-point AI visibility checklist:
# [Your Company] - Security Platform Overview
> AI-powered [category] for [target market]
[Your Company] provides [one-sentence description].
We serve [specific customer segments] across [industries].
## What We Are
- Managed Detection and Response (MDR) platform
- Cloud-native, SaaS delivery model
- 24/7 SOC with human analysts
## What We Are NOT (Important Distinctions)
- NOT a self-hosted SIEM (we are fully managed)
- NOT agent-based (we are agentless)
- NOT just software (we include human analysis)
## Compliance Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II: Certified since [year], audited by [auditor]
Recertified: December 2025
- HIPAA: BAA available, covers [specific capabilities]
- FedRAMP: [Status - Authorized/In Process]
## Core Capabilities
- [Capability 1]: [One sentence with metric]
- [Capability 2]: [One sentence with metric]
## Documentation
- Trust Center: /security
- API Docs: /docs/api
- Changelog: /changelog
- MITRE Mapping: /mitre-coverageThe Changelog as Freshness Signal
In cybersecurity, "old" implies "insecure" or "abandoned." AI models have a recency bias for technology queries. If your last major content update was 2023, AI lowers its confidence score, assuming you might be legacy tech. This ties into the broader content strategies that actually work for AI citations.
Freshness Signal Tactic
Maintain a public changelog or "What's New" feed at /changelog and include it in your sitemap.xml and llms.txt.
Regular, dated updates signal to AI that the entity is "alive" and "active." When a user asks "What are modern/current solutions for X?", active changelogs serve as a timestamped heartbeat that pushes you ahead of competitors who haven't published since last year.
LLM Sitemap Structure
Unlike XML sitemaps (which just list URLs), an LLM Sitemap is an HTML page that gives AI context about your content structure. It combines human navigation with semantic information AI can extract.
What Makes LLM Sitemap Different
XML sitemaps tell crawlers "these pages exist." LLM Sitemaps tell AI "here's what these pages are about, how they relate to each other, and what questions they answer."
For a cybersecurity vendor, this means organizing content by: Solutions (by role, by use case), Compliance (by regulation), Integrations (by platform), and Resources.
Key sections for your LLM Sitemap:
| Section | What to Include | Why AI Needs It |
|---|---|---|
| Solutions by Role | CISO, SOC Analyst, Security Engineer pages | Matches "best [tool] for [role]" queries |
| Compliance Hub | SOC 2, HIPAA, FedRAMP, GDPR sections | Matches "[regulation] compliant [tool]" queries |
| Integration Directory | AWS, Azure, Splunk, ServiceNow pages | Matches "[tool] that integrates with [platform]" |
| Use Cases | Threat detection, compliance automation, etc. | Matches problem-focused queries |
| Section FAQs | 3-5 questions per section with answers | Pre-answers queries directly on sitemap |
Schema Implementation
Add this to your homepage and key pages:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Your Company",
"description": "[Exact same description as llms.txt]",
"hasCredential": [
{
"@type": "EducationalOccupationalCredential",
"credentialCategory": "certification",
"name": "SOC 2 Type II",
"recognizedBy": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "AICPA"
}
}
]
}Content Architecture: What AI Actually Cites
AI doesn't cite "comprehensive guides." It cites specific, quotable content that answers specific queries. Your content architecture needs to create citation opportunities.
The Threat Report Citation Hack
Most security vendors write threat reports. Few optimize them for AI citation. Here's what works: AI systems heavily cite specific data from original research. When your threat report says "we observed a 340% increase in credential stuffing attacks targeting healthcare organizations in Q3," that becomes quotable.
Threat Report Citation Tactic
Create a dedicated "Key Findings" page for every threat report with numbered findings:
Finding 1: We observed a 340% increase in credential stuffing attacks targeting healthcare organizations in Q3 2025.
Finding 2: 67% of successful breaches exploited unpatched vulnerabilities older than 90 days.
AI extracts these as authoritative data points. Your competitors write 40-page PDFs that AI can't parse. You write 500-word summary pages that AI quotes verbatim.
Alt-Text Engineering for Architecture Diagrams
Cybersecurity buyers trust architecture diagrams. Modern AI (GPT-4o, Gemini) is multimodal. It "looks" at your images. If your "How it Works" diagram is a flat PNG with alt text "architecture diagram," you are invisible.
<img src="arch.png" alt="architecture diagram">
RAG systems scrape text but ignore pixels. Your security architecture is completely invisible.
Use SVGs with embedded text, or write 300-word "Caption-based Interpretations" immediately below:
"Figure 1: Data flows from Collector (A) through Encryption Tunnel (B) to Cloud Analysis Engine (C). Customer data never leaves the premises..."
The Vendor Security Questionnaire as Content
Every security vendor completes hundreds of security questionnaires (VSQs) per year. Most treat this as a cost center. Smart vendors turn questionnaire answers into AI-ready content.
Tactic
Create a public FAQ page from your top 50 VSQ questions. Use FAQPage schema. Now when ChatGPT is asked "Does [Company] support SSO?", it has a structured answer to cite.
Advanced Tactics for Security Vendors
1. The "Competitor Comparison" Page Play
When someone asks ChatGPT "Compare [Your Company] vs [Competitor]," what does it find?
Most vendors don't own their comparison narrative. Create structured comparison pages with:
- Feature-by-feature comparison tables
- Use case fit ("Best for" statements)
- Compliance coverage comparison
- Integration compatibility matrix
The vendor who creates the comparison page controls the narrative AI uses.
2. The "Adjective Seeding" Strategy
AI recommendations often use adjectives: "fastest," "most comprehensive," "best for small teams." Where do these adjectives come from?
They come from external sources. Reviews, articles, forums.
Tactic
When requesting G2 reviews, frame the ask: "We'd love to hear about your experience, especially around speed of deployment and quality of support."
Reviews that mention "fastest deployment I've seen" seed the adjective "fast" into AI's understanding of your brand.
3. MITRE ATT&CK Mapping as Structured Data
Security buyers increasingly ask AI questions tied to MITRE ATT&CK framework. "What tools detect T1059?" "Which XDR covers persistence techniques?"
If your MITRE coverage is a PDF, AI can't cite it. Create HTML pages with structured tables:
| Technique ID | Technique Name | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|
| T1059 | Command-Line Interface | Process monitoring with behavioral analysis |
| T1566 | Phishing | ML-based email analysis with attachment sandboxing |
| T1078 | Valid Accounts | UEBA detecting anomalous login patterns |
When someone asks ChatGPT "What tools detect T1059 command-line interface attacks?" your table becomes a citable source.
4. The "Docs-to-Marketing" Injection
Technical buyers (and AI agents acting for them) often search documentation to verify claims before visiting the marketing site. Most docs are dry and devoid of value propositions.
Add "Micro-Positioning" to your top 10 most visited documentation pages:
"To configure SSO, go to Settings..."
"The SSO configuration allows large enterprises to enforce zero-trust access policies seamlessly. To configure..."
5. The "What AI Gets Wrong" Content Play
Search ChatGPT and Perplexity for queries in your category. Find answers that are wrong or outdated.
Create content that explicitly corrects common misconceptions:
Example: "Is SIEM Dead? Why the 'SIEM is obsolete' narrative misses the point"
When AI encounters a query like "Is SIEM still relevant in 2026?", your corrective content becomes a valuable counter-source.
6. Certification Date Freshness Signal
Certifications have dates. Old dates equal stale signals.
Tactic
Update certification content annually, even if nothing changed. Add "Recertified [Year]" or "Most recent audit: [Date]" to your compliance pages.
The vendor who shows "SOC 2 Type II - Recertified December 2025" looks more current than the one showing "SOC 2 Type II certified" with no date.
Authority Building: Second-Order Citations
You optimize for AI to cite you directly. Good. But here's the expert move: optimize for AI to cite pages that cite you.
Example: Dark Reading publishes an article about SIEM trends. They mention your company as an example. ChatGPT cites Dark Reading. Your brand appears in the response even though AI didn't visit your site.
AI cites Dark Reading. Dark Reading mentions you. Your brand appears without AI visiting your site.
Publications AI Cites Most for Cybersecurity
*Based on citation frequency analysis across 500+ security queries*
| Publication | AI Citation Rate | Best Pitch Angles |
|---|---|---|
| Dark Reading | Very High | Threat research, incident analysis, tool comparisons |
| SecurityWeek | High | Vulnerability disclosures, market analysis |
| CSO Online | High | CISO perspectives, compliance topics |
| SC Magazine | Moderate | Product reviews, awards coverage |
| Krebs on Security | High | Breach analysis, threat actor profiles |
The Strategy
Pitching Dark Reading isn't just PR anymore. It's AI visibility infrastructure. Track which publications AI cites most frequently for your category queries, then pursue coverage specifically on those publications.
Integration Partner Entity Boost
AI systems cross-reference entities. When AI sees your company listed on Okta's integrations page, AWS Partner Directory, and Splunk Marketplace, it builds confidence that you're a legitimate player in the ecosystem.
Audit every integration partner's website:
- Are you listed correctly?
- Is your company name consistent?
- Is your description accurate?
Priority integrations to audit for cybersecurity vendors:
| Category | Platforms to Audit |
|---|---|
| SIEM/SOAR | Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM QRadar, Chronicle |
| Identity | Okta, Azure AD, OneLogin, Ping Identity |
| Cloud Marketplaces | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| ITSM | ServiceNow, Jira, PagerDuty |
Each correct listing is an entity signal. Each inconsistency fragments your entity.
Authority Building Priority
*Ranked by AI citation frequency in security category*
| Source Type | What to Do | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| G2 / Capterra / TrustRadius | Add certifications to profile. Request reviews mentioning compliance. | 1-2 weeks |
| Industry Publications | Pitch Dark Reading, CSO Online, Security Week with compliance angles. | 2-4 weeks |
| Press Releases | Issue PR for every certification, major feature, funding round. | 1 week |
| Analyst Reports | Ensure Gartner/Forrester profiles are current with certifications. | Ongoing |
| Reddit / Communities | Answer compliance questions in r/cybersecurity, r/sysadmin. | Ongoing |
The 70/30 Rule
Aim for 70% of your key claims to appear on 3+ independent sources. The remaining 30% can be unique details on your site. Core certifications, integrations, and differentiators need external validation.
90-Day Execution Plan
Here's the week-by-week roadmap. Each phase builds on the previous.
*Timeline expectations based on 50+ cybersecurity vendor implementations*
| Platform | First Results | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Perplexity | 2-4 weeks | Real-time web search, SEO-driven |
| Google AI Overviews | 4-8 weeks | Tied to search index |
| Claude | 60-120 days | Periodic training updates |
| ChatGPT | 60-180 days | Larger model, slower updates |
01Days 1-14: Foundation
02Days 15-45: Content Build
03Days 46-90: Authority & Scale
The Bottom Line
- •Your security product might be excellent. AI doesn't know that. AI systems recommend entities they recognize and trust. Recognition comes from consistency. Trust comes from corroboration.
- •Second-order citations compound. Getting covered by Dark Reading isn't just PR. It's AI visibility infrastructure. Publications AI already trusts become your amplification layer.
- •Specificity beats comprehensiveness. "XDR for 50-person fintech with SOC 2" outperforms "Complete Guide to XDR" every time. Match how CISOs actually ask ChatGPT questions.
- •The technical stack matters. llms.txt + disambiguations + LLM Sitemap + Changelog tell AI exactly what you do, what you're NOT, and that you're actively maintained.
- •The window is closing. Companies building AI presence now shape what AI says about their category for years. The ones who wait will find themselves invisible in the conversations that matter.
Frequently Asked Questions

Yuval Halevi
Helping SaaS companies and developer tools get cited in AI answers since before it was called "GEO." 10+ years in B2B SEO, 50+ cybersecurity and SaaS tools clients.
Related Articles
The Cybersecurity Content Problem: Why 'What is XDR?' Articles Are Dead
AI killed informational cybersecurity content. When a CISO asks 'what is SIEM?' they get the answer in ChatGPT.
AI VisibilityThe 51-Point AI Visibility Checklist: What Actually Gets You Cited
51 tested tactics to get cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. Authority signals, consensus building, and technical setup.
AI & SEOLLM Sitemap: How to Get Your Brand Discovered by AI Search
Learn how to create a structured sitemap that helps AI language models discover and understand your content.