You asked ChatGPT "what's the best [tool] for [your use case]." You watched it search. You saw your site URL flash by in the sources. And then... it recommended your competitors. Not you.
This is one of the most frustrating experiences in AI visibility. ChatGPT visited your site. It read your content. And it still didn't cite you. What's going on?
When you use ChatGPT with web browsing enabled, it goes through a specific process. Understanding where you lose is the first step to fixing it.
The key insight: being crawled and being cited are two completely different things. ChatGPT checks many sources. It only cites the ones that pass its evaluation criteria for that specific query.
ChatGPT doesn't recognize you as an authoritative source in your category. You have limited third-party mentions (press, podcasts, analyst coverage).
Fix: Build authority signals: PR, podcast appearances, industry publication mentions. This is 70% of the problem.
Your content doesn't have clear, quotable statements that ChatGPT can extract. It's buried in long paragraphs with no structured formats.
Fix: Restructure with answer-first format. Add quotable statements in first 100 words.
Query asks "best for startups" but your content targets enterprise. You're not positioned for the specific query type being asked.
Fix: Create content that explicitly claims your positioning with supporting evidence.
Competitor pages have clearer structure, more comparison content, and directly answer common queries.
Fix: Audit competitor content. Identify what makes it more citable. Create equally extractable content.
Content loads via JavaScript after page load. Robots.txt blocking AI crawlers. Content behind paywalls.
Fix: Ensure content is server-rendered. Check crawler access. Audit technical accessibility.
This is the #1 reason companies get checked but not cited. Your content quality might be identical or even better than competitors. But ChatGPT uses external signals to determine who to trust.
Result: Checked, not cited
Result: Cited as recommendation
Most companies jump straight to content optimization. That's the wrong order. Here's the right sequence:
Establish clear, consistent entity definition across the web.
Get mentioned by sources ChatGPT already trusts.
Now optimize content structure for AI extraction.
Why this order matters: Content optimization without authority is like optimizing a website nobody trusts. ChatGPT will still check your site and still not cite you. Build trust first.
Weekly Test
Run 10-20 key queries. Track: Checked? Cited? Position?
Citation Rate
Cited queries ÷ Total tested. Target: 30%+ for category queries.
Authority Signals
Track new mentions, podcast appearances, PR placements monthly.
Timeline: Authority building takes 2-4 months to affect citation rates. Content optimization shows faster (2-4 weeks) but only if authority foundation exists.
The Bottom Line
ChatGPT checking your site but not citing you is an authority problem, not a content problem. Your content may be excellent. But ChatGPT uses external signals to decide who to trust.
The fix is sequential: Build entity foundation → Generate authority signals → Then optimize content.
This takes time. Expect 3-6 months for meaningful improvements. Start now.

Helping SaaS companies and developer tools get cited in AI answers since before it was called "GEO." 10+ years in B2B SEO, 50+ cybersecurity and SaaS tools clients.
We've helped 50+ B2B companies go from "checked but not cited" to recommended by AI.
Get a Free AI Visibility Audit